Copyright 2007 - Copyright Warning - Violators Will Be Prosecuted
Rights reserved  - U.S. Copyright Law Carries Criminal & Civil Penalties for
Infringement  - 17 U.S.C. § 506 and 18 U.S.C. § 2319
Limitation of Liability in Maritime Lawsuits
Maritime Jobs - Marine Jobs - Deckhands - Tankermen - Able Seaman - Maritime Jobs - Deck Engine - Employment in the Maritime
Industry - Work on Ships - Yachts - Tugboats - Cruise Ships
The Law of Limitation of Liability
The law is codified under federal law as 46 U.S.C. §§ 181 to
196 (United States Code) and states that a shipowner may
limit liability for losses from negligence or unseaworthiness
arising without his privity or knowledge, to the value of the
vessel or his interest in the vessel and freights pending.
What this means is that lawsuits and claims for wrongful
death, personal injury and property damage could be limited
to the residual value of a vessel if the owner did not have
knowledge or participation in the negligence or
unseaworthiness that caused the accident.







The loss of the SS Morro Castle in 1934 led to a major
change in limitation law. Until then, the law held that a vessel
owner could limit losses to the post-accident value of the
vessel, as described above. In 1912, with the Titanic, that
amount was about $95,000 for a string of lifeboats retrieved
from the frigid New Foundland waters. However, the public
was not going to let that happen again after the Morro Castle,
which was consumed by flames in September of 1934 with a
loss of 137 lives. When the owners succeeded in limiting
their liability to the $20,000 residual value of the charred
remains of the ship, there was enough anger from the public
to lead to Loss of Life Amendments. These legal
amendments stated that if the residual value of the vessel
was insufficient to satisfy the resulting wrongful death and
bodily injury lawsuits, a limitation fund of $60 per ton would
be established. This amount was again increased in 1984 to
$420 per ton.
In Maritime Law , there is a legal concept known as limitation of liability. Basically, it
works like this. A vessel owner can limit the payout to the plaintiffs suing him for wrongful
death, personal injury and property damage in an accident if he did not have a hand in the
factors causing the accident.
Back to Maritime Law page , dealing with general law topics.
These lawsuits included It has been invoked in a number of large scale wrongful death
and personal injury lawsuits, namely the RMS Titanic, SS Morro Castle and the Staten
Island Ferry Andrew Barberi.
Limitation Denied....
When the City of New
York attempted to limit
its payout on the
wrongful death and
personal injury lawsuits
following the accident
with the Staten Island
Ferry Andrew Barberi (11
people were killed in the
catastrophic accident
and over 60 were
injured), it did not
succeed. In federal
court, the judge did not
allow limitation of the
plaintiff’s total awards to
be capped at $14.4
million, the post-
accident value of the
ferry. This was largely
due to findings made by
the National
Transportation Safety
Administration in its
investigation of the
accident.
The photo above shows the horrific manner in which the
steel plating of the Staten Island Ferry was torn open by
the concrete and steel of the maintenance pier at St.
George Terminal. The vessel is estimated to have struck
the pier at approximately 17 knots.
united states coast guard photo
Job Alert Working with legal issues... see Contract Specialist with the U.S.C.G., involving
purchasing vessels and goods. Limitation of liability is a legal tactic used in accident or
injury lawsuits.  Under U.S. law, the statute is known as the Limitation of Shipowners’
Liability Act of 1851. It has been invoked in wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits.